home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
092892
/
0928991.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
63 lines
<text id=92TT2135>
<title>
Sep. 28, 1992: Gamesmanship
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Sep. 28, 1992 The Economy
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK, Page 18
NATION
Gamesmanship
</hdr><body>
<p>To debate or not to debate? That depends on who asks the
questions
</p>
<p> Both George Bush and Bill Clinton say they are anxious to
debate. But each insists on his own terms, which is why, with
six weeks to go before the election, no debates have been
scheduled. And it's possible that none will be held at all.
</p>
<p> The debate about the debate format has itself become a
test of a candidate's resolve. Clinton backs the bipartisan
Commission on Presidential Debates proposal for a single
moderator, in part because it allows for more give-and-take
between principals. Two weeks ago, Bush agreed to two debates
before a panel of three journalists and a moderator, seeking to
exploit his ability to match wits with reporters while avoiding
a single moderator's power to focus on a single issue, like the
economy. The Bush camp gave Clinton until last Friday to agree
to its terms. The deadline passed. Both sides agree on one
point: unless someone relents, the debates may not occur.
</p>
<p> Still 10 to 12 points ahead in most polls, Clinton can
better afford to hang tough. Aside from differences on format,
Bush is delaying in part to give his attacks on Clinton's draft
record time to sink in with the public, putting Clinton on the
defensive in the first debate while taking some pressure off the
incumbent. But if Bush can narrow Clinton's edge in the polls
quickly, officials say, he may not need to debate at all. Said
a White House official last week: "If we were within 5 points,
I'd say we shouldn't debate. But if we aren't, we may need to
debate."
</p>
<p> As if the two-way maneuvering weren't complicated enough,
Ross Perot rejoined the game again last week, making an
appearance on NBC's Today show to reaffirm his unhappiness over
both Bush's and Clinton's economic plans. With Arizona becoming
the 50th state ready to put the Texas billionaire on the
November ballot, Perot appeared on the edge of re-entering the
race. "I'm trapped," he told his TV audience last Friday. "They
won't sell [TV airtime] to me unless I declare as a candidate.
So I may be the first guy in history that had to declare as a
candidate so he could buy TV time." No telling where this ploy
ends.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>